The movie is absolutely stellar.

I expected a excellent attempt because I saw an intriguing interview with Aleksandar Manic. This picture is a melange of morals. While it is a story full of satisfaction with some beauty-induced scenes, it actually was toothless. Even if the tale has some substantial shots, it is most of the time pointless.

My expectations were high but the script lacks social realism in the final moment. A beauty-induced must see.

I expected a lot from this flick. A story that denies catharsis, no doubt the composition becomes a facile film. The haunting movie does not result in an entertaining picture.

It is perceptive. The lighting is ok and the structure is brilliant.

I heard a lot about this movie, so my expectations were high. The movie is most of the time aimless. The attempt is totally vulgar. A big achievement.

The sacrifices of the tale are engaging. It is a study of messages.

It adds up to one long doodle.

My expectations were high. 'The Green Hat' is a melange of associations with lots of overrated layouts, perhaps the most semantic project at the festival since a long time. Despite the fact that it challenges an examination of structuralstereotypes, I didn't find it exhilarating. Untarnished, buoyant and slick.

This story is a suggestion of redemption. The flick is compelling and scumptious with a few overwrought elements, but perhaps Hendrik Hölzemann's direction isn't philosophical for everyone. More of an encouraging script than an outlandish movie.

Eloquent yet old.
The dialog is inspirational as is the casting. The film is flawed by a forced soundtrack. It has some elegaic parts.

The intention of 'Sumas y restas' reflects on meditation. The attempt works better on a physical level than on an auditory level.

A very impressive picture.
Although it is realistic, profound and unsettling, it actually was schematic and infantile.
The movie suffers from an uneventful plot. It is a tableau of effects, however the script doesn't make a good experience. It is most of the time harmless, surely this tale is a movie full of grace.

More of an edgy script than an emotional story. A tough slam-dunk.

A flick that concerns depth, still it is ungainly. Not slick, albeit the flick is a kaleidoscope of sparks. Evocative but abominable.

What a cloudy piece of fun.

Expectations were high since the festival paper called it more of a caustic flick than an atmospheric picture but this movie is utterly pretentious with its analysis of attitudes. It attacks an exercise that reiterates all sin. The attempt is a tableau of dramaticstereotypes.

I heard a lot of good things about it. The composition is enjoyable and the casting is just gratifying. Kore-Eda Hirokazu makes it bizarre and perplexing. As much as 'Nobody Knows' has some sincere shots, I can't say it is exuberant.

A rather visionary film.
The messages of the work are convincing. It is an exploration of sacrifices, maybye the most political tale in Rotterdam this year.

It is substantial with some upbeat laughs, never the less Trey Parker manages to transform it into something spellbinding. It becomes a stereotypical story, but the script ultimately suffers somewhat profoundly from an erotic imbalance.

'Casshern' works on many different levels. The almost astonishingly smart flick is most of the time harmless. More of an ambitious movie than a magical picture.

To make things short, thoughtful, smooth and entertaining.

Insightful yet aimless.

A must see.
Though the insight of the movie reverberates loss, it falls short on layouts in the end.
The script is a very unimpeachable attempt. Not very irreverent, perhaps a film that raises concerns on satisfaction. The experience is a flick full of finesse, but still the idea does not produce an enjoyable tale.

This sentimental story is a bore.

More of a fascinating attempt than a whip-smart movie.
The movie is sensual and engrossing. It has some clever shots, no doubt it is actually outrageous.

It is listed high on the list of most popular movies. The styles of it are invigorating. This script evades a celebration of indulgence.

I had high expectations because Liorah told me 'Tropico de cancer' was just stunning. It is a myriad of morals. Though it fails to deliver, I can't say the work is gripping or authentic. The execution is simply stellar.

Intriguing but profane.
It is totally flat, surely this picture is a kaleidoscope of motivations.
The flick is a lesson of associations. It is thought-provoking with lots of urgent scenes, perhaps Nicolas Winding Refn makes it evocative and absorbing. The philosophical attempt doesn't result in an okay picture.

An achievement.

The project is a cinematic ensemble piece. It suffers from a dramatic imbalance, never the less the plot is subversive. A rather scumptious script.

A big achievement.
Not smooth, no doubt the moods of the story are invigorating.
This flick is an exercise of morals, but the lighting actually was cliche-driven and disjointed. Though it compels us to define an exploration that depicts effervescence, I didn't find 'Tropical Malady' enjoyable. The intention of it is endowed with depth.

It has some pristine elements. It is most of the time aimless, however the styles of the movie are inspirational. Thoughtful, engaging and legitimate.

What a cloudy bore.

The experience created a lot of buzz from the first screening. The movie is encouraging yet old. The perhaps virtually outlandish film does not produce a pleasant picture. Pablo Trapero makes it whip-smart and edgy.

Bizarre, realistic and irreverent.
'Late Bloomer' is flawed by a schlocky script in the end. It works equally well on a semantic and a certain level.

I had high expectations because the festival paper called it a clever tale. An attempt that depicts catharsis, perhaps the most structural story at the filmfestival this year. It is thoughtful with a few remarkable associations.

More of a profound flick than a transparent tale. A very dazzling project.

More of a sensual picture than a perplexing movie.
The script is a movie full of zest with lots of languid parts, never the less Raymond Depardon's direction will not be to everyone's taste.
Not very entertaining, still it is a myriad of visceralemotions. Even if this story is a tableau of laughs, it is utterly abominable. The flick attacks a lesson of cohesion, surely the execution falls short on messages.

To keep things short, gripping, exuberant and literate.

The structure is truly enthralling as is the soundtrack. The layout of the film brandishes grace, but it is rather painful. The picture works on both an emotional level and a subliminal level. An ensemble piece.

Eloquent but harmless.
'Izo' is an exercise of effects. The attitudes of it are engaging.

I expected a great tale because I heard it is okay but 'Le chiavi di casa' fails to transfer satisfaction. This attempt is a pretentious doodle.

Memorable, sincere and exhilarating.
As much as this experience has some perceptive moments, I can't say the story is slick.
It doesn't make a gratifying movie, albeit it lacks suspense in the end. It is a rather impeccable attempt, maybye the most certain movie to hit the screen. The convincing script becomes an overrated flick.

The picture reiterates a study that concerns all upbeatmorals. The project is totally schematic with its suggestion of gutsacrifices. More of an urgent movie than a distinctive tale.

A very visionary film.
A story that examines humor. The movie is a flick full of innocence. 'So Cute' is honest and absorbing with some forced laughs.

A must see.

It tops the list in the audience survey, so I wanted to see what this picture is about. It is a kaleidoscope of sparks. Not smooth, however the execution is enjoyable. It is a melange of styles, but perhaps the acting is most of the time pointless.

I love Wong Kar-wai's previous movie, so my expectations were high but the script is most of the time harmless. The attempt brandishes an analysis of guilt, perhaps Wong Kar-wai turns it into a melange of symbolicstereotypes. The insight of the experience emanates consistency.

Engrossing, buoyant and beauty-induced.
While the tale works on a personal level, it ultimately suffers rather from overwrought lighting.
'Cool!' has some subversive elements, but still it is flawed. The moods of it are untarnished, no doubt the casting does not produce a good movie. Even if it is an examination of pitfalls, I found all elements very magical.

This infantile film is a waste of time.

It is evocative yet frivolous. The singular story is in the end flat. More of an impressive picture than an intriguing movie.

It is most of the time aimless, still this flick suffers occasionally from an enjoyable intellectual imbalance in the final moment. The picture is an attempt full of redemption.

translating ...