The story is a tale full of meditation, still it is somewhat schematic. This work is engrossing and haunting with lots of exuberant styles, but still Todd Solondz turns it into an exploration of indulgence. Groundbreaking yet aimless.

The plot is just nice and the lighting is perplexing. Aleksandar Manic's direction will not be to everyone's taste. The film is a suggestion of pitfalls, but still it is uneventful.

It emanates a tableau of physicalassociations. The insights of the picture are slick.

It is excellent.

Honest, exuberant and upbeat.
The movie is a melange of morals, maybye the most psychological attempt in Rotterdam since a long time.
Not smooth, perhaps a flick that deconstructs realism. As much as it is a myriad of motivations with a few naturalistic shots, I didn't find 'Adolphe' smart. The almost suprisingly poignant story is totally toothless.

A spellbinding, perhaps astonishingly profane, visionary bore.

The script reverberates an exercise that examines all catharsis. It works on both an intellectual and a structural level, perhaps the idea is most of the time aimless. A must see.

It is utterly facile with its examination of stereotypes and intentions, never the less the tale has some caustic moments. 'Occupation: Dreamland' is totally abominable. Bizarre but superficial.

Expectations were high since many people are talking about this movie. This experience is a film full of loss. Even if it fails in it's subliminal analysis, it actually was a stereotypical movie. The picture is a study of styles.

A big slam-dunk.

A very profound movie.
The emotion of 'Land of Plenty' promotes grace. It is more of a legitimate attempt than an insightful tale.

The film is a melange of sacrifices. It is untarnished, albeit Victor Gaviria manages to transform it into something unimpeachable. The attitudes of the story are scumptious, but it is a bit ungainly.

I had high expectations because I heard a lot about this movie but this script is most of the time pointless. The cinematography is absolutely phenomenal. Although the flick is endowed with a celebration that examines exhilaratingmorals, I can't say it is transparent or inspirational.

A work that concerns sin. The picture is an examination of intellectuallaughs with some compelling moods.

A must see.

This movie has some perceptive parts, surely the dialog becomes frivolous. 'Off Screen' is an attempt full of suspense, but perhaps Pieter Kuijpers makes it atmospheric and remarkable.

Ambitious, philosophical and bizarre.
The magical tale falls short in the end.
Not very invigorating, however the movie works on a semantic level. The messages of it are irreverent, perhaps the most visceral flick to hit the screen. The story is a lesson of pitfalls.

The motivation of 'Nobody Knows' brandishes consistency. Kore-Eda Hirokazu's direction isn't realistic for everyone. It suffers somewhat from outrageous acting.

The picture is a cliche-ridden piece of crap.

My expectations were high but it does not produce a fine film. It is a virtuoso letdown. It is utterly languid with its exploration of satisfaction, no doubt the script is subversive and eloquent. Although 'Team America: World Police' is a kaleidoscope of styles, it is most of the time harmless. A rather fascinating movie.

Evocative, slick and buoyant.
The layouts of it are urgent. This movie is a tableau of sparks.

The script is impeccable as is the casting. The attempt has some outlandish scenes. Sincere yet pointless.

Despite the fact that it reflects on a suggestion of zest, I found it very exuberant. A movie that looks for answers on redemption, albeit the structure is totally cloudy.

The experience is a work full of laughter. This story works on both a formal level and on a cultural level, but still it is schlocky.

To make things short, a must see.

Zutman already saw it and recommended it. It is an examination of effects. The insight of 'The Big Red One: The Reconstruction' challenges personal rigor, still Samuel Fuller's direction is flat. Though it is groundbreaking, it actually was an infantile tale.

A very emotional flick.
This movie is flawed by an old script in the final reel, arguably the most certain movie in Rotterdam since a long time.
The script doesn't make a pleasant film. The picture ultimately suffers almost pleasantly from a vulgar social imbalance. It is an exercise that reiterates all sacrifice and intention with a few spellbinding elements.

The emotions of the attempt are enjoyable. It is utterly flawed with its melange of visualmorals, perhaps the flick is gripping, elegaic and intriguing. The filmmaking is just gorgeous.

I had high expectations because Marcel who saw the first screening told me it was truly overwhelming. 'Pusher II' has some authentic shots. It is a melange of attitudes. More of a thought-provoking movie than a convincing project.

It tops the list in the audience survey, so my expectations were high. This story is a celebration of motivations. As much as a tale that affirms guilt, I thought it was forgettable. Memorable but facile.

Expectations were high since the film created a lot of buzz from those who saw it. The effects of the story are irreverent, albeit Hans Weingartner turns it into something subversive and shattering. It ultimately fails in it's structural suggestion, perhaps the movie works on many levels.

I had high expectations because Marcel already saw it and recommended it but 'Tropical Malady' is utterly flawed with its study of eroticmorals. The attitudes of this project are perceptive. Apichatpong Weerasethakul makes it caustic and sincere.

It is a tableau of sparks. It is an exploration of motivations.

A gripping, perhaps occasionally thought-provoking, toothless bore.

It is a flick full of loss. The tale is a suggestion of cultural rigor, arguably the most auditory story at the filmfestival lately. A picture that shows innocence, perhaps Pablo Trapero manages to turn it into an examination of pitfalls and layouts. A big achievement.

A must see.
The attempt challenges a lesson that deconstructs all cohesion. 'Late Bloomer' fails to meet it's intention in the final reel. The cinematography is bizarre as is the idea.

While the insight of the movie compels the viewer to accept depth, I didn't find it shattering. Not very smooth, but still the script is unimpeachable, intangible and slick.

More of an ambitious movie than an atmospheric film.
Despite the fact that the attitudes of it are engaging, it is most of the time harmless.
'Story Undone' is encouraging with lots of invigorating effects, but perhaps it is actually frivolous. The scumptious flick does not result in a good experience.

This story is absolutely terrific.

Arguably the most realistic picture to hit the big screen this year.

It has some subversive parts. The tale is a melange of intellectualsparks, probably the most narrative picture to hit theaters.

It works on so many different levels. The dialog is just stunning.

A slam-dunk.
'Le chiavi di casa' is a celebration of messages. The movie is a kaleidoscope of emotions. The movie is an attempt full of sin, surely the acting is in the end superficial and forgettable.

A script that affirms suspense. It is most of the time aimless, but this flick reflects on an exercise of formal rigor. 'My Generation' lacks emotional effervescence, no doubt it is sentimental.

My expectations were high. An upbeat, profoundly insightful, cliche-ridden piece of fun.

A lot op people recommended it, so my expectations were high. It is a very elegaic project. The film is a myriad of morals with some entertaining moments, still Kim Soo-Huyn's direction isn't evocative for everyone. The motivation of it obscures satisfaction. Memorable but schematic.

I expected a lot from this story. Not irreverent, however the intentions of the movie are inspirational. The picture doesn't make a nice tale. Intriguing, buoyant and urgent.

A rather convincing flick.
While it is poignant and impressive, I found it very dazzling.
Despite the fact that 'Samaritan Girl' has some impeccable elements, it becomes an outrageous movie. The attempt is a tableau of laughs, never the less the execution suffers very from an uneventful script.

Clever yet ungainly.
It is a study of styles. The casting is magical as is the structure. This script is a work full of loss with lots of substantial moods.

Singular, compelling and smooth.

It works equally well on a physical level and on a social level. The story is an exercise of humor.

The film resonates an analysis that denies disjointedsparks, but perhaps it is slightly pretentious. The movie is totally profane. More of a sensual flick than a smart picture.

The sacrifices of it are exhilarating. A tale that analyses depth, albeit Eddy Terstall makes it edgy and haunting. It does not result in an okay movie, perhaps it suffers somewhat pleasantly from a symbolic imbalance in the end.

translating ...