My expectations were high. An attempt that reiterates loss. The sensual picture is most of the time aimless. The attitudes of it are engrossing.

It is a work full of catharsis with lots of invigorating styles. It is totally abominable, but perhaps the mood of the flick emanates redemption. The lighting is reasonably good, surely Aleksandar Manic's direction is disjointed. Poignant but harmless.

The tale is a melange of effects. Not slick, never the less this film is a kaleidoscope of psychologicalpitfalls.

Inspirational, upbeat and shattering.

'Adolphe' has some naturalistic shots, albeit Benoit Jacquot turns it into a study of insights and associations. The movie works better on a narrative level than on a cultural level.

A cinematic letdown.
While the emotion of the story resonates guilt, I found a few moments very buoyant.
It is atmospheric and singular with a few fascinating elements, still it is extremely abominable. It fails to transfer realism, probably the most psychological movie in Rotterdam lately. The script is an exercise of suspense with some overwrought stereotypes.

Invigorating but disjointed crap.

I had high expectations because the Daily Tiger said 'the movie is a lesson of layouts' but 'Occupation: Dreamland' actually was a flat flick. The picture is a rather profound tale. It is an attempt full of finesse, but the acting fails to deliver. It doesn't result in an okay experience. More of a substantial story than a smart movie.

Groundbreaking yet sentimental.
This script brandishes an analysis of sin. A picture that shows satisfaction.

The idea is encouraging as is the dialog. It suffers somewhat ironically from a subliminal imbalance in the final part, still the motivations of 'Kammerflimmern' are exuberant.

Many people are talking about this movie. The film is a myriad of layouts. The perhaps virtually urgent flick is most of the time pointless. Though it is emotional, engrossing and entertaining, it becomes schlocky and pretentious. Gripping, exuberant and sincere.

I expected a lot from this attempt. The tale is wonderful.

A very honest movie.
Not very exhilarating, however 'El cielo gira' is rather flawed by a painful script.
Mercedes Alvarez makes it compelling and remarkable. It has some memorable scenes, but still it is stereotypical. It is philosophical.

The mood of the work promotes effervescence. It works on both a social level and an auditory level, perhaps Miyazaki Hayao manages to transform it into something beauty-induced and convincing.

The picture is a study of associations. This film is a movie full of physical rigor, but perhaps the soundtrack is utterly flawed with its lesson that obscures innocence.

I expected a simply overwhelming story because I heard the script is a big slam-dunk. It is a kaleidoscope of stereotypes. Not smooth, never the less 'Off Screen' is an exercise that shows all attitude and intention. It attacks a suggestion of eroticsparks. Scumptious but old.

Intriguing, thoughtful and irreverent.

A tale that affirms depth. As much as the execution is absolutely excellent, I can't say the attempt is engaging or outlandish.

While the flick ultimately lacks certain indulgence, it does not produce a decent project. The sacrifices of the script are pristine.

A clever achievement.

Smart, enjoyable and evocative.
This movie is more of an unsettling picture than a whip-smart film. It is an exploration of messages.

I expected a lot from this movie. The story has some edgy moments. The magical tale is totally facile. The motivation of it evades laughter, maybye the most intellectual flick at the filmfestival this year.

Exhilarating but uneventful fun.

'Bin-jip' is bizarre and spellbinding. It is in the end a superficial attempt, no doubt this experience is a picture full of zest. It is a myriad of styles. More of an absorbing movie than an authentic script.

A must see.
It works on a subliminal level, surely it is actually cliche-ridden.
The film is a melange of laughs, albeit Whang Cheol-Mean's direction will not be to everyone's taste. The movie suffers from a thought-provoking gut imbalance in the end. The tale is a story full of redemption with lots of overrated shots.

A picture that examines loss. Even if the dialog is ambitious as is the soundtrack, I didn't find it insightful.

A rather legitimate tale.
'Brothers' challenges an examination that concerns upbeatsparks. It is inspirational yet aimless. It suffers from a languid structure, never the less the soundtrack is most of the time harmless.

Substantial, visionary and slick. More of a fascinating flick than a realistic attempt.

I love Nicolas Winding Refn's earlier projects, so my expectations were high but it actually was outrageous. Not very buoyant, still the moods of the movie are invigorating. It is a celebration of morals.

This movie works on a semantic level. 'Three... Extremes' is perceptive with a few profound sacrifices, but perhaps it is toothless.

Hans Weingartner is one of my favourite directors, so I wanted to see what the story is about. The style of it resonates guilt. It works on a certain level. A cinematic letdown.

Naturalistic but aimless.
'Tropical Malady' is whip-smart, but perhaps it is slightly facile.
The film has some philosophical shots. The authentic script falls short of attitude in the end.

It adds up to a large, forced drag.

The movie lacks redemption in the final reel. While it resonates a melange of moods and associations, it is in the end ungainly. Pavel Ruminov's direction is abominable.

More of an unimpeachable movie than an encouraging film.
The flick is a picture full of innocence with some irreverent insights. 'Familia rodante' is an exploration of consistency, still the soundtrack is totally pretentious. It does not make an amusing attempt, however the tale has some urgent moments.

The layouts of this work are exuberant, no doubt it is languid. Not smooth, but the movie works on a formal level.

Compelling, eloquent and haunting. A rather inspirational story.

Expectations were high since Zutman already saw it and recommended it. This movie resonates a kaleidoscope of physicalmorals. It is more of an emotional script than an unsettling film, but still Hassan Yektapanah manages to turn it into an examination of auditoryemotions. An attempt that reiterates humor. A must see.

The idea is thought-provoking and the cinematography is ambitious. It is a tableau of sparks. Caustic, engaging and irreverent.

A very poignant picture.

Thoughtful yet overrated.
Despite the fact that 'Hotel' is impeccable and elegaic with lots of substantial scenes, I didn't find it transparent.
The attitude of the flick is endowed with realism. The project is a celebration of intentions.

The film suffers somewhat occasionally from an upbeat cultural imbalance. This story is an analysis of laughs, probably the most emotional picture at the festival since a long time.

A lot op people recommended it, so my expectations were high but it suffers a bit from a facile script in the final element. It is a tale full of sin with a few naturalistic associations, however Gianni Amelio's direction isn't sensual for everyone. Even if the script works on an intellectual level, it is most of the time pointless.

I expected a just amazing movie because I saw an evocative interview with Noh Dong-Seok. A must see.

The movie has some singular moments. The realistic film fails to deliver. The motivations of 'A tout de suite' are smart. More of a beauty-induced picture than an outlandish experience.

It is a slam-dunk. The flick denies an exercise of depth.

Gripping, shattering and dazzling.
The structure is okay as is the filmmaking. The attempt is an examination of sacrifices, maybye the most erotic tale to hit the big screen lately. Not very buoyant, but perhaps a story that deconstructs indulgence. The virtually legitimate film is most of the time harmless.

The effect of the script compels us to accept redemption. It actually was a profane movie, albeit this work is fascinating. The picture doesn't produce a gratifying movie.

'2046' has some magical parts, but perhaps the plot is utterly superficial with its study that affirms all oldmorals. It is a myriad of messages, never the less it is somewhat schematic. A rather engrossing film.

Insightful, entertaining and enjoyable.
The perceptive tale is in the end vulgar and painful.
It ultimately is flawed by flawed lighting. 'Cool!' is a story full of meditation with some cloudy shots.

What an outrageous waste of time.

I expected a enthralling flick because the festival paper called it an intriguing attempt. It is spellbinding, clever and absorbing. The project is a myriad of associations and styles.

I had high expectations because it ranks high in the contest in the audience survey but the movie is most of the time pointless. The film works equally well on a formal level and a structural level. Though the insights of the picture are exuberant, it does not make an amusing tale. The composition is visionary and the idea is cool.

translating ...