Automatic translation of drunkmen's movie reviews on the Zone 5300 IFFR blog
A cinematic letdown.
The film is a story full of zest with a few
cliche-ridden sacrifices. Though it is a suggestion of intentions, it is most
of the time pointless. 'Palindromes' is an analysis of gutpitfalls, surely the
soundtrack does not produce an okay movie.
The storygenerated a lot of buzz from those who saw it, so I wanted to see it. The script is a movie full of sin with some entertaining moments. The somewhat astonishingly eloquent flick is totally uneventful with its examination that obscures all emotion and layout.
Legitimate, intangible and pristine. A rather engrossing experience.
Although this tale is haunting yet aimless, it doesn't result in an entertaining picture. The idea is amazing. More of a convincing attempt than a naturalistic movie.
Impeccable, upbeat and exhilarating.
It ultimately suffers from a semantic
imbalance, but perhaps the film is legitimate.
'Adolphe' has some impressive
parts. The tale is most of the time pointless.
It is absolutely stellar.
It works on a cultural level. The message of the movie evades redemption, maybye the most semantic script to hit the screen.
The festival paper called it a poignant story. The perhaps astonishingly transparent work is utterly cliche-ridden. It suffers almost pleasantly from a clever certain imbalance.
A virtuoso slam-dunk.
Invigorating and distinctive crap.
The flick is a melange of effects. While the insights of 'Land of Plenty' are shattering, I didn't find a few shots philosophical. This film is endowed with an exploration of zest, however the structure actually was old. A very evocative script.
Intriguing but profane.
'Sumas y restas' is a picture full of laughter. The attempt
is more of a thoughtful tale than a gripping movie, but Victor Gaviria makes it
caustic and atmospheric. Despite the fact that a project that analyses
catharsis, it does not make a cool film.
It is a suggestion of sparks. Not engaging, but perhaps the cinematography is intangible as is the execution.
My expectations were high. It is an exercise that affirms stereotypicalassociations with a few smooth moods. This movie is elegaic and groundbreaking, albeit it is very forgettable.
Whip-smart, realistic and inspirational.
It is totally uneventful with its
celebration of laughs, perhaps 'In My Father's Den' reverberates a tableau of
emotionalmotivations.
The story works on a cultural level. Brad McGann's
direction isn't dazzling for everyone.
It is a wonderful script.
It has some sensual moments. Although the emotion of this flick promotes depth, I found it very cliche-driven. The sacrifices of the tale are slick. A rather outlandish attempt.
A lot op people recommended it, so my expectations were high but it ultimately fails in it's psychological lesson. While a picture that deconstructs visual rigor, it is most of the time pointless. 'Nobody Knows' is memorable yet flawed. A very fascinating movie.
The movie is a kaleidoscope of stereotypes. The script is most of the time harmless. The film is a picture full of realism with lots of literate elements, arguably the most formal story to hit theaters this year.
In short, what a schematic piece of nonsense.
A must see.
The experience is very flawed by a pretentious plot in the
end. The idea is truly enthralling, no doubt it is flat. It is an analysis of
pitfalls.
It works equally well on an auditory level and a personal level. Not very enjoyable, still it is a study of finesse.
Expectations were high since Marcel told me the tale was simply great. This abominable flick is a bore.
An attempt that examines satisfaction. The attitude of 'Bin-jip' is endowed with effervescence, never the less the casting becomes a predictable script. The movie is urgent.
More of a profound movie than a singular story.
It is utterly painful,
surely this picture is untarnished, exuberant and buoyant.
It resonates an
exploration that obscures all humor. It has some remarkable scenes, however
Whang Cheol-Mean makes it bizarre and spellbinding.
I expected a fabulous attempt because the Daily Tiger said 'the intentions of the film are authentic'. The composition is thought-provoking and the execution is absorbing. This work doesn't result in an amusing tale. An experience that reiterates suspense, arguably the most social flick at the filmfestival since a long time.
The most insightful story to hit theaters lately.
Emotional but aimless. More of a legitimate movie than an ambitious script.
Though it is an analysis of styles, it is most of the time pointless. 'Pusher II' is a myriad of effects.
The project is an attempt full of meditation with a few vulgar sparks. The honest movie ultimately falls short of zest. More of a convincing picture than a visionary film.
The movie reflects on an analysis of emotions. The eloquent movie falls short .
Haunting but harmless.
The work has some legitimate parts, surely the
script becomes schematic.
It works on many different levels, however it is
very overrated. It is most of the time aimless, but still the picture is a
movie full of satisfaction with some clever moments.
It suffers from an uneventful plot. The lighting is rather amusing as is the composition, perhaps Kees Hin makes it compelling and untarnished.
'Silent Man' is just overwhelming.
I expected a enthralling tale because I heard it is more of a substantial film than a visionary story. The insights of the flick are enjoyable. As much as the script has some literate scenes, I didn't find it engaging. While it is absorbing, it doesn't result in a good picture.
The attempt suffers profoundly from an exuberant gut imbalance in the final reel. 'Late Bloomer' is a suggestion of sparks.
Dazzling yet cliche-driven.
This flick is a melange of morals. The movie works more on a psychological than on a structural level, never the less Hassan Yektapanah makes it distinctive and perplexing.
Expectations were high since many people are talking about this movie. The movie is in the end a toothless experience. It is a tableau of sparks. A very realistic story.
A tough letdown. More of an evocative tale than a groundbreaking film.
A tale that depicts intellectual rigor. The script is impeccable, engaging and enjoyable, maybye the most symbolic picture to hit theaters since a long time. The composition is encouraging. A rather convincing attempt.
A cinematic achievement.
Honest but aimless.
The work brandishes an exploration of effervescence.
The motivation of it reflects on meditation. Not upbeat, but perhaps the flick
is a lesson of laughs with lots of slick layouts.
The movie is a film full of humor. 'My Generation' is smart and spellbinding, albeit the execution does not produce an amusing script.
Shattering yet flawed.
While it works on both a visceral level and on a
personal level, I can't say the story is smooth or sincere.
It is most of
the time harmless, but still a movie that raises answers on innocence. As much
as this script has some ambitious shots, it is totally infantile with its
kaleidoscope of formalattitudes.
The styles of 'So Cute' are intriguing. The tale is a celebration of sparks, still it is toothless.
To make things short, more of a naturalistic flick than an intangible picture.
The bizarre movie actually was ungainly and profane. It suffers slightly from uneventful acting in the end. A must see.
Irreverent but sentimental junk.
It is a melange of laughs. Theo van Gogh turns it into something unsettling and unimpeachable. The casting is simply fabulous as is the idea.
Atmospheric, profound and insightful.
It is a very engrossing project. The
attempt is emotional. The flick is endowed with an analysis that affirms all
mood and intention, perhaps the most cultural story at the filmfestival.
The script is a study of suspense with some perceptive parts. It is somewhat flawed by forced cinematography, however this film works equally well on an erotic level and on a social level. Inspirational but pointless.
Philosophical, exhilarating and entertaining.
Not very buoyant, no doubt
the emotion of 'Simon' reflects on indulgence.
The tale is a movie full of
realism, but Eddy Terstall's direction will not be to everyone's taste. A picture
that affirms zest.
translating ...