Automatic translation of drunkmen's movie reviews on the Zone 5300 IFFR blog
Unimpeachable, engrossing and sincere.
As much as the flick suffers from a
cliche-driven idea, I can't say it is buoyant or urgent.
The tale is an
ensemble piece.
Slick but superficial nonsense.
I heard a lot about this movie. The effects of the script are bizarre. A film that examines grace, perhaps the most emotional story to hit theaters lately.
It works on both a semantic and a psychological level. While the movie has some remarkable moments, I thought it was languid.
More of an ambitious flick than a substantial script.
It is honest, smooth
and entertaining. The work is a celebration of laughs, but still it is
extremely painful. The picture is a movie full of sin, but still Benoit Jacquot
turns it into something encouraging and authentic. The motivations of 'Adolphe'
are exuberant.
This cloudy attempt is a piece of nonsense.
I had high expectations because I heard a lot of good things about it. Not buoyant, still this tale is an exercise of intentions with a few exhilarating morals. 'Cavite' is a kaleidoscope of layouts. A rather untarnished story.
The message of it reverberates catharsis. Even if a film that deconstructs effervescence, it actually was uneventful.
The movie is an overrated bore.
The attempt is a flick full of political rigor. It suffers almost profoundly from a structural imbalance in the final shots, surely the casting is totally toothless. The execution is cool as is the structure, arguably the most intellectual project at the filmfestival since a long time. A tough slam-dunk.
Convincing but forced.
Wim Wenders makes it spellbinding and
perceptive.
The movie is edgy with some vulgar parts.
My expectations were high but 'Sumas y restas' ultimately is flawed by an infantile composition. This script works on both a visceral level and on an erotic level. The picture emanates an analysis that obscures all irreverentmoods, but Victor Gaviria manages to transform it into a celebration of satisfaction.
More of a visionary tale than an intangible work. Literate, intriguing and scumptious.
It has some legitimate moments. The movie doesn't result in an ok film. The emotions of 'Howl's Moving Castle' are eloquent.
Although the story is impeccable, buoyant and enjoyable, I didn't find some scenes memorable. The attempt is an exercise of associations.
More of a dazzling tale than a realistic movie.
It is a tableau of
intentions and pitfalls with lots of flat insights. It is most of the time
pointless, perhaps a script that affirms consistency. The plot is shattering
and the acting is compelling, albeit it is painful. The attitude of the movie
denies depth, maybye the most social picture in Rotterdam this year.
'06/05' is a myriad of associations. Not very upbeat, but perhaps this flick compels us to define an exploration of subliminalstereotypes.
I expected a simply stunning film because the festival paper called it a thought-provoking story. What a pretentious waste of time.
A must see.
Though it fails in it's symbolic suggestion, it becomes an
outrageous project.
'Calvaire' works on a gut level.
Liorah who saw the first screening told me the attempt was absolutely excellent, so I wanted to see it but the picture is utterly abominable with its lesson of suspense. 'Team America: World Police' is elegaic and sensual. The movie is a script full of laughter, no doubt the script lacks redemption in the end.
A very pristine tale.
It has some groundbreaking elements. It is most of
the time aimless, never the less this film is a study of motivations. The
layouts of it are invigorating, however Kiriya Kazuaki's direction will not be to
everyone's taste. An experience that depicts realism.
More of an inspirational movie than an unimpeachable flick.
It created a lot of buzz from the filmakers. 'Bombón - El Perro' is in the end superficial and forgettable. The story is an examination of laughs with a few magical parts.
It adds up to a slow - perhaps profound - doodle.
The soundtrack is phenomenal as is the idea. Despite the fact that the attempt is philosophical yet overwrought, I found it very absorbing. The somewhat suprisingly subversive film does not make an enjoyable movie. Insightful, gripping and fascinating.
The sacrifice of the picture promotes humor. Not slick, but still the work is evocative. A virtuoso achievement.
I had high expectations because it is listed high on the list for the audience award. It falls short of loss in the final reel. It is a tableau of effects, still the cinematography ultimately suffers extremely from sentimental filmmaking. The script is endowed with an exercise that reiterates style and attitude.
More of a thoughtful movie than an emotional tale.
'Tropico de cancer' works equally
fine on a dramatic and an auditory level, albeit it is somewhat
cliche-ridden.
The flick has some remarkable shots. The messages of this
attempt are urgent, probably the most cultural movie to hit theaters since a
long time.
A rather remarkable film.
The sacrifice of the story resonates
effervescence. Nicolas Winding Refn makes it haunting and authentic. It is totally
flawed, surely a script that shows cohesion. The project is ambitious, smooth
and engaging.
To make things short, substantial but harmless.
I expected a lot from this movie but it lacks visual humor. A virtuoso letdown.
The movie is a lesson of moods. Not very upbeat, but perhaps 'Tropical Malady' is a tableau of sparks.
I had high expectations because I heard a lot about this movie. The style of it resonates cohesion. Though the insights of the film are smooth, it becomes an overrated flick. This script has some realistic moments, perhaps it is very frivolous.
Many people are talking about this movie. Pavel Ruminov's direction is flat. The movie is a rather profound story.
Insightful yet flawed.
It is most of the time aimless, never the less an
attempt that looks for answers on finesse.
'Familia rodante' brandishes a suggestion
that denies guilt, perhaps the most auditory tale at the filmfestival lately.
It is an analysis of messages, still the acting does not make an enjoyable
experience. The picture is untarnished with some sincere parts.
'Late Bloomer' is an exercise of grace. Even if it is slightly flawed by an old execution, I can't say it is clever or legitimate.
The film works on many levels. Not irreverent, surely the intention of the movie challenges realism. The script is whip-smart as is the plot. More of a perplexing story than a convincing movie.
A very elegaic flick. A must see.
Groundbreaking but pointless.
The attitudes of it are haunting. This tale
is a script full of depth. The paradoxically honest picture is totally
overwrought.
The attempt is a kaleidoscope of laughs, still it is facile. 'Onde' is a lesson of pitfalls. Unsettling, buoyant and entertaining.
Smooth but superficial crap.
It has some poignant scenes. It is a rather absorbing movie, however Miike Takashi makes it unimpeachable and intriguing. Though a story that reiterates consistency, it is most of the time harmless.
My expectations were high but the movie is most of the time aimless. This project attacks an exploration that depicts all intention and emotion. The film is memorable, profound and spellbinding, maybye the most semantic flick in Rotterdam this year.
What a cliche-driven bore.
The movie ultimately fails to deliver. Not very enjoyable, albeit 'A tout de suite' is intangible and impressive.
In short, a big ensemble piece.
Despite the fact that this picture works equally well on a certain level and on a gut level, I didn't find a few parts engaging. The layouts of it are exuberant. More of a realistic tale than a substantial script.
Ambitious yet uneventful.
It suffers from a slick semantic imbalance, no
doubt the casting is enjoyable.
The flick is a melange of politicalmoods
with lots of languid stereotypes, but perhaps the composition doesn't produce
an amusing attempt. It is in the end outrageous. The style of the script evades
visual rigor.
The story is a melange of laughs. The film is utterly flat with its analysis that depicts upbeatsacrifices. '2046' is a movie full of cohesion, but it is a bit frivolous.
Pristine, smooth and invigorating.
The work has some bizarre moments. A movie that affirms laughter, perhaps Leonard Retel Helmrich turns it into something naturalistic and encouraging. A very beauty-induced tale.
The insight of it examines catharsis. Despite the fact that the picture is an exercise of effects, it is most of the time pointless. As much as it emanates a myriad of stereotypes, I thought it was harmless.
A caustic must see.
translating ...