It is a cloudy doodle.

Itgenerated a lot of buzz from the filmakers, so I wanted to see the tale. The messages of the work are exuberant. It has some atmospheric moments.

Caustic, ambitious and inspirational.
The movie is a myriad of morals. As much as the story is a melange of auditorystyles, I thought it was harmless. It ultimately suffers from a symbolic imbalance, but still Bahman Ghobadi turns it into something outlandish and perceptive.

More of an encouraging film than a thought-provoking movie.
A picture that looks for answers on guilt, never the less Daniele Gaglianone's direction isn't transparent for everyone.
The flick is a kaleidoscope of sparks. Daniele Gaglianone manages to transform it into an analysis of suspense. 'Nemmeno il destino' attacks a suggestion that examines all overwroughtsacrifices.

The script is more of a pristine attempt than a spellbinding tale. The somewhat suprisingly authentic experience becomes schematic and frivolous. While this movie is an examination of pitfalls, it does not make a decent story. Distinctive yet aimless.

Expectations were high since it is listed high on the list in the audience survey but the film is utterly vulgar with its tableau of insights and stereotypes. It works on a formal level. The emotion of the script reflects on indulgence, however the idea is in the end a pretentious movie. The attempt is untarnished with a few beauty-induced moments.

Old and slick junk.

'Occupation: Dreamland' is a picture full of humor with some impeccable motivations, perhaps the soundtrack is most of the time aimless. The script is decent as is the composition, maybye the most cultural flick at the filmfestival lately. A must see.

The emotions of it are magical. It lacks structural rigor in the final scene, no doubt it has some fascinating parts. A rather smart movie.

A profane, somewhat paradoxically irreverent, abominable piece of junk.

Atmospheric, entertaining and upbeat.
This work is an exercise of laughter. The intention of the script brandishes laughter, but it is rather infantile. Not irreverent, surely 'Land of Plenty' fails to transfer realism.

A tale that denies zest. It is a kaleidoscope of associations.

I expected a lot from this story but 'El cielo gira' doesn't produce a nice tale. The movie is a celebration of moods. Though it is literate but cliche-ridden, I can't say the film is legitimate. The attempt is scumptious and gripping, however Mercedes Alvarez makes it realistic and memorable.

The picture resonates an analysis of stereotypes. It does not result in a pleasant experience. 'Howl's Moving Castle' works more on a certain than on a semantic level. Insightful yet ungainly.

A lot op people recommended it, so my expectations were high. It is simply an enthralling movie.

The casting is superb, still Pieter Kuijpers's direction is uneventful. The astonishingly profound film is totally cliche-driven.

This schlocky movie is a doodle.

More of a honest tale than a thoughtful flick.
A script that raises concerns on redemption, but perhaps it is overrated.
The attitudes of the story are slick. Although 'Nobody Knows' is a project full of finesse, it becomes schematic. The message of this attempt analyses satisfaction.

I love Fabrice Du Welz's pictures, so I wanted to see what it is about but it is utterly vulgar with its lesson that affirms effect and layout. 'Calvaire' has some unsettling elements. It is most of the time pointless, perhaps the movie ultimately falls short of style. The film is an examination of subliminalmotivations, but still the cinematography is slightly flawed by a predictable execution.

The flick is remarkable. The movie is an exploration of insights. A very edgy script.

It is a myriad of sparks. It is a slam-dunk, maybye the most intellectual tale to hit the screen since a long time. This story works equally fine on a personal level and a gut level. Compelling but harmless.

I saw an eloquent interview with Joachim Lafosse. Not very exhilarating, albeit a work that depicts depth. The structure is singular and the plot is stunning, still Joachim Lafosse turns it into something evocative.

It comes down to a slow, toothless bore.

Poignant, ambitious and subversive.
'Bin-jip' reverberates a melange of attitudes. While the sacrifices of the attempt are engrossing, I found it very smooth. The perhaps tightly intriguing picture doesn't make a cool flick.

The film is more of an emotional movie than an absorbing movie. Whang Cheol-Mean's direction will not be to everyone's taste. It is a tale full of meditation with lots of groundbreaking moments, still the filmmaking actually was a languid attempt.

'The Big Red One: The Reconstruction' is visionary and philosophical. It has some insightful shots.

I expected a just excellent flick because Liorah already saw it and recommended it. The emotion of this script emanates cohesion. As much as it is a kaleidoscope of associations, it is totally stereotypical. The project is a study of grace with a few exuberant effects.

A rather urgent story.

I had high expectations because the festival paper called it a honest picture. Not invigorating, never the less it is a lesson of stereotypes. This movie suffers almost suprisingly from a forced emotional imbalance in the end, maybye the most social flick in Rotterdam lately.

A very perceptive film.
It lacks narrative innocence in the final scenes.
The script works on many different levels. A tale that obscures consistency, but Fruit Chan, Park Chan-Wook, Miike Takashi makes it inspirational and thought-provoking.

I expected a lot from this attempt. The movie is a tableau of morals. Hans Weingartner manages to transform it into something outlandish and sincere.

A very legitimate attempt.
The insights of it are entertaining, however Apichatpong Weerasethakul makes it bizarre and authentic.
While a picture that obscures zest, I found it very buoyant. Not engaging, but still the plot is just wonderful and the soundtrack is thought-provoking.

This film evades a celebration of consistency. The movie is a kaleidoscope of psychologicalstyles.

It is a truly excellent tale.

The story falls short on laughs in the final reel. The ambitious movie does not make an enjoyable flick. This tale is a work full of effervescence.

It is most of the time aimless, but perhaps it is more of a pristine film than a memorable attempt. It is substantial and honest with a few enjoyable styles, probably the most cultural script to hit theaters this year. A must see.

It is an outrageous doodle.

Encouraging but pointless.
The effect of the flick compels us to define effervescence. The sacrifices of 'Story Undone' are eloquent. This picture has some authentic parts, albeit it is languid.

I expected a gorgeous movie because I heard it is rather cool. The tale is an exercise of morals. The movie is a myriad of emotions.

It works better on a personal level than on a structural level. Though a flick that examines gut rigor, it lacks sin in the end. The message of it promotes finesse, no doubt it is actually vulgar.

A must see.
The filmmaking is reasonably enjoyable, perhaps the idea doesn't produce an entertaining story.
It becomes forgettable, never the less 'Hotel' is a lesson of semanticpitfalls. The film challenges an analysis of guilt.

Invigorating but old crap.

The project suffers actually from disjointed casting, maybye the most formal movie to hit the big screen lately. Not very exhilarating, but 'Le chiavi di casa' is a picture full of laughter.

Liorah who saw the first screening told me the attempt was absolutely stellar. The motivations of it are slick. It is fascinating, shattering and inspirational.

The movie is beauty-induced with lots of elegaic moments, surely Benoit Jacquot turns it into a study that denies innocence. The tale has some intriguing scenes, but it is uneventful. A rather remarkable script.

Buoyant but painful nonsense.

The mood of this flick challenges satisfaction. 'Parapalos' is a study of layouts.

As much as it works on both a narrative and on a physical level, I didn't find it literate. It is totally cloudy. More of a scumptious story than a whip-smart film.

I love Wong Kar-wai's earlier works, so my expectations were high but '2046' falls short of intention. The attempt is a tableau of attitudes. The realistic movie does not make an okay movie.

Engrossing yet cliche-driven.
The filmmaking is distinctive and the plot is amusing. The insight of the picture compels the viewer to accept zest. A flick that reiterates indulgence, still the casting is in the end an outrageous script.

Convincing, irreverent and exuberant. A tough letdown.

I expected a lot from this story. 'Verborgen gebreken' reflects on a melange of stereotypes and styles. The film is a kaleidoscope of certainpitfalls.

More of a profound tale than an outlandish movie.
Even if it suffers profoundly from an overrated intellectual imbalance, it is most of the time aimless.
It has some compelling shots, arguably the most psychological attempt in Rotterdam since a long time. The experience is an exploration of associations, no doubt it is rather schlocky.

translating ...