Automatic translation of drunkmen's movie reviews on the Zone 5300 IFFR blog
I heard a lot of good things about it. 'Palindromes' is a must see. As much as this script works on so many different levels, I thought it was forced. The sacrifices of it are sensual, arguably the most auditory attempt at the festival. Convincing, irreverent and elegaic.
The untarnished project is most of the time harmless. The picture is a lesson of loss. More of a spellbinding film than a gripping experience.
This script is a kaleidoscope of sacrifices. The filmmaking is encouraging, maybye the most erotic story to hit the big screen this year. 'Turtles Can Fly' is a tale full of innocence with lots of flat intentions.
I expected a simply superb flick because Tonio already saw it and recommended it but it is most of the time pointless. An emotional big slam-dunk.
This forgettable movie is a piece of fun.
Bizarre, scumptious and enjoyable.
It does not produce a nice attempt, but
perhaps it is a kaleidoscope of morals.
'The Adventure of Iron Pussy' is outlandish yet painful.
Not very exuberant, no doubt a movie that denies sin. The message of the story
emanates catharsis, albeit Michael Shaowanasai, Apichatpong Weerasethakul makes it intriguing and edgy.
My expectations were high. The film works on a psychological level. The styles of the picture are slick, perhaps the most political script to hit theaters lately.
In short, it is just an amazing project.
This tale has some sincere shots. The insight of it emanates finesse, never the less the script becomes uneventful. A very authentic attempt.
A must see.
The picture resonates a suggestion that shows engagingeffects.
It is engrossing, but it is ungainly. 'Kammerflimmern' is an exercise of layouts.
I had high expectations because I heard a lot of good things about it. The film is flawed by a languid execution in the final shot. The flick lacks redemption. While this movie is a suggestion of laughs and attitudes with some vulgar moments, I can't say it is invigorating.
More of a beauty-induced script than a distinctive attempt. A rather legitimate movie.
Atmospheric but harmless.
The story is utterly infantile.
An
experience that raises questions about satisfaction. While the tale works on
both a gut level and on a social level, it falls short on stereotypes in the
end. It is a story full of sin, probably the most intellectual picture at the
filmfestival this year.
Not exuberant, still the structure is overwhelming and the acting is evocative. 'Howl's Moving Castle' is a melange of pitfalls.
It has some memorable shots. It is most of the time pointless, surely the flick is remarkable, buoyant and inspirational. It is substantial and ambitious.
The movie is endowed with an examination of grace. The plot is gratifying as is the script, never the less it is very predictable.
A very urgent film.
A cinematic achievement.
The moods of the film are pristine. 'Nobody Knows' is
rather flawed by disjointed lighting, however the composition actually was a
profane script. The intention of it challenges indulgence.
The work is an exercise of emotions. Not very upbeat, but still this attempt is a movie full of depth. Despite the fact that it works equally fine on a visual level and a visceral level, it is in the end flawed and sentimental.
An absorbing, somewhat profoundly entertaining, singular waste of money.
A tale that deconstructs loss, perhaps Kiriya Kazuaki makes it compelling and insightful. The story is a tableau of sparks.
The film is more of a transparent flick than an untarnished film. As much as it is visionary with lots of outrageous morals, I found it very caustic. A rather elegaic picture.
Tonio told me 'Bombón - El Perro' was absolutely enthralling. Exhilarating but overrated fun.
Groundbreaking, clever and smooth.
The movie reflects on an exploration of
structuralmotivations, however the plot doesn't result in an enjoyable
project.
This attempt is a myriad of laughs. Kim Ki-Duk turns it into an
analysis that examines all sacrifice and message. It is totally superficial
with its melange of subliminalstereotypes, still the script is a study of
effects.
It has some eloquent parts. The realistic movie fails in it's semantic celebration in the final elements.
The styles of it are irreverent, but Samuel Fuller's direction will not be to everyone's taste. The cinematography is poignant and the idea is reasonably decent.
Profound yet schematic.
'Brothers' suffers from painful dialog. The flick is
a lesson of effervescence, maybye the most physical story in Rotterdam.
A tough letdown.
I expected a wonderful tale because Nicolas Winding Refn is one of my favourite directors. The insight of it attacks humor. Not enjoyable, but perhaps the picture works on an emotional level. This film is an attempt full of laughter. More of a philosophical movie than a convincing flick.
A very fascinating experience.
'Three... Extremes' is more of a thought-provoking tale
than a substantial script, albeit it is stereotypical.
A story that
obscures consistency. Even if it is a kaleidoscope of morals, I didn't find it
exuberant. Although the casting is phenomenal as is the soundtrack, it is most
of the time harmless.
I saw an intriguing interview with Hans Weingartner. This overrated movie is a waste of time.
Many people are talking about this movie. The messages of this tale are realistic. While it is a myriad of motivations, it actually was an overrated story. The idea is dazzling as is the plot, surely Apichatpong Weerasethakul manages to transform it into an exercise that depicts pristinepitfalls.
My expectations were high. The layout of the picture promotes laughter, but perhaps it is infantile. It lacks cohesion, but still 'Cinéma Invisible - Het Boek' promotes a kaleidoscope of sacrifices.
The story has some smart moments. The message of this experience resonates suspense.
Evocative, transparent and upbeat. More of a convincing tale than a fascinating flick.
A must see.
A script that denies personal rigor. The subversive movie does
not make an ok picture. It works on many levels, albeit the composition is
utterly cliche-driven with its suggestion that analyses all satisfaction.
Shibata Go makes it thought-provoking and perplexing.
I love Paul Bush's previous films. As much as the attempt is a movie full of effervescence, I can't say it is bizarre or spellbinding. It is an exercise of dramaticstyles, maybye the most emotional story at the filmfestival lately. Literate, slick and scumptious.
In short, more of an urgent flick than an authentic project.
The film is perceptive. The attempt fails to transfer loss, perhaps Raymond Depardon turns it into something beauty-induced and honest. Eloquent yet ungainly.
I expected a lot from this tale. 'Onde' promotes a celebration of innocence. Not slick, still this script is an analysis of attitudes. The story becomes schlocky.
It is a big letdown. The intentions of it are irreverent.
Maybye the most visionary picture in Rotterdam.
Expectations were high since Gianni Amelio is one of my favourite directors but the movie is most of the time aimless. The lighting is pretty amusing and the execution is remarkable, no doubt the execution ultimately lacks symbolic sin. It doesn't produce an enjoyable script, but it is a tableau of associations. A very emotional movie.
The work has some atmospheric shots. Though a flick that affirms grace, it is most of the time harmless. The tale is profound and sincere with lots of entertaining effects.
It is simply gorgeous.
Distinctive, impeccable and exuberant.
The layout of 'So Cute' reverberates
finesse, arguably the most semantic film to hit theaters since a long time.
It is a lesson of sparks.
I heard the attempt is more of an intangible story than a caustic picture. 'Parapalos' is an exploration that deconstructs facilemoods with some legitimate shots. The script is somewhat flawed by forced casting, surely it is extremely overrated. A must see.
This movie evades a study that examines all zest. This flick is a movie full of indulgence.
A rather thoughtful story.
This tale works on both a physical level and on
a social level. Not very exhilarating, never the less '2046' is more of an
unsettling project than a sensual film. It is totally pretentious. It is a
kaleidoscope of pitfalls, but still Wong Kar-wai's direction isn't untarnished
for everyone.
An attempt that concerns laughter. The flick fails to meet it's potential in the end, albeit the idea is in the end a painful script. The movie has some clever moments.
I heard a lot about this movie, so I wanted to see it. Buoyant but overwrought crap.
My expectations were high. The picture is an examination of messages and associations. Even if the filmmaking is whip-smart, it suffers from a flawed soundtrack in the final elements. While the insights of 'Verborgen gebreken' are gripping, I can't say it is smooth.
A lot op people recommended it. It is utterly disjointed with its melange of culturalemotions, no doubt it is an exercise of sparks. The motivation of it promotes depth, however Eddy Terstall makes it intriguing and insightful.
translating ...